Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,803 questions • 9,489 answers • 950,450 learners
Clever stuff happening!
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,803 questions • 9,489 answers • 950,450 learners
Hi, I'm doing the quiz and ¿Usted lo ________ ? is the question - the correct answer is listed as comprende however the phrase can you understand it? is second person not 3rd so wouldn't comprendes be correct?
No hay nada sobre de uvas en esta historia, pero me gusto mucho.
Buenas tardes Silvia (o Inma),
I was just wondering...
In everyday speech, would "nada más" + infinitive' = "as soon as", be used as often as, e.g. en cuanto or apenas?
Gracias y saludos
In some of these sentences it seems that para would work just as well, for example, in the following: Por [eso/aquello de] no tener que pelar las gambas con las manos decidió pedir mejor calamares fritos.
So that he wouldn't have to peel the prawns with his hands he decided to order fried calamari.Why can’t I use para?
Why prefieres ir a la playa and not prefieres va a la playa
So the audio is not working. Can someone fix it? Mucho gracias!
Hi
Shouldn't aprender a and empezar a also be in this list? It is really useful.
can I use retorno instead of vuelvo for "I return"? I took a quiz and it marked it wrong because I did. does it matter which one you use?
Hola, ¿Pueden arreglar el audio por favor? !Muchas gracias! …. Can someone fix the audio please
Find your Spanish level for FREE
Test your Spanish to the CEFR standard
Find your Spanish level