Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,888 questions • 9,631 answers • 965,894 learners
Let me take a look at that...
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,888 questions • 9,631 answers • 965,894 learners
https://progress.lawlessspanish.com/my-languages/spanish/tests/take/4180465 This excercise is not translated to spanish
1. In the second sentence, "para que te acuerdes de que me he portado muy bien"...Why isn't recordar accepted here?
2. In the sentence, "Además, desearía que ayudaras a las personas enfermas"... why isn't "ojalá que" accepted as a translation of "I hope"?
Could you highlight this difference in the lesson in yellow or some sort of emphasis?
If we want to express the same but in the negative, the structure changes to:
llevar (conjugated) + sin + infinitive
And also, if correct, please add the explanation that the action changes from past participle to infinitive because sin is a preposition, and that prepositions are followed by infinitives, not past particples.
I see that “el” and “la” are based off masculine or feminine. How do I know if a general noun (e.g. car) is masculine or feminine tense?
It appears from your examples that “se” is optional, although I don’t see that explicitly stated. For example, “ Ayer me depilé las piernas.” doesn't have “se” in it.
"el pulque lo sirven en las pulquerias" why do we use "lo" in this sentence
Many years ago in a Mexican Spanish school I was taught that in a sentence like. No creo que Susana venga/haya venido hoy only those 2 options are correct. The imperfect and pluperfect subjunctive are only used if the verb in the main clause is in a past tense. There seems to be disagreement on this topic. What does RAE say? Is there regional variation on this topic?
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level