Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,776 questions • 9,415 answers • 937,803 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,776 questions • 9,415 answers • 937,803 learners
I wonder why a "to" is shown after "to tend." Since the examples have an infinitive after a conjugated "tend," it seems the extra "to" is superfluous.
How does one determine whether to use "sido" or "estado" with haber in such instances as "I have been a good person..." or "I have been seen with ..." or "I have not been trying hard to..."?
Also, with regard to "he, has, ha....etc.", is this conjugation referred to as the present perfect indicative, the past perfect indicative (preterito perfecto), or both?
In the third sentence, all the words in the list of nouns have a definite article in front of them, except for "tiranía." Why is that? It seems inconsistent.
The kwiziq page "Ser vs Estar in Spanish: Using ser in Spanish (not estar) to talk about time, days, dates and seasons" (Ser vs Estar in Spanish: Using ser in Spanish (not estar) to talk about time, days, dates and seasons) says
Hoy es lunes. = Today is Monday. ("Today" is singular.)
but
Son las tres de la tarde. = It's three o'clock in the afternoon. ("It" is plural.)
Why are these different?
1) Just wondering if "las ciencias medioambientales" is the most common way to say environmental sciences? The online dictionary I used suggested "la ciencia ambiental".
2) Can you use "así" in place of "de esta manera" in the sentence: "cree que de esta manera podrá ayudar..."?
Should la mayoría be followed by son? La mayoría isnt plural.
please could you provide an option to skip the south american only grammar.
Thanks
What is the difference between para la que and para el que.
Can someone please explain when we cannot use either of the two.
Gracias!
The phrase "not be much for" is more idiomatic and translates to "not enjoy" or "not be in the habit of". I have never heard it used in the positive, however. You might say "He's not much for taking walks" to mean "He doesn't enjoy taking walks". However, I have never heard something like "He's much for taking walks". There's a positive version that's a bit more enthusiastic: "to be a great one for". For example, "He's a great one for playing practical jokes".
I answered this as "estan pidiendo"
But the exam says the right answer is "piden".
Isn't "estan pidiendo" more accurate answer?
Find your Spanish level for FREE
Test your Spanish to the CEFR standard
Find your Spanish level