Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,924 questions • 9,691 answers • 981,361 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,924 questions • 9,691 answers • 981,361 learners
Why: que había muchas opciones rather than: que hay muchas opciones or even subjunctively: que haya muchas opciones?
Wouldn´t some other options for "appetizer" include: entrante, aperitivo, entrada?
For "main course": plato principal, plato fuerte
for "some": algunos/algunas as in "algunas buenas verduras"
Could this also mean, I was probably....?
Hello
when we use para que we need to use subjuntivo imperfecto e indicativo,
Just a suggestion, I was wondering if we could potentially include like a flashcard series equivalent where we can test new vocab we come into throughout kwiziq. So that we have the ability to review it after not coming across it for some time.
I disagree strongly with this answer. Despite the fact that the future tense can be used for speculation, the norm in conversation is "Qué pasa?" in everyday conversations. At best, both responses should be marked correct. I think it would be well for Kwiziq to center responses on normal, everyday conversations in quizzes rather than obscure literary ones.
The phrase "not be much for" is more idiomatic and translates to "not enjoy" or "not be in the habit of". I have never heard it used in the positive, however. You might say "He's not much for taking walks" to mean "He doesn't enjoy taking walks". However, I have never heard something like "He's much for taking walks". There's a positive version that's a bit more enthusiastic: "to be a great one for". For example, "He's a great one for playing practical jokes".
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level