Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,820 questions • 9,536 answers • 953,894 learners
I'll be right with you...
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,820 questions • 9,536 answers • 953,894 learners
Another explanation I have seen tells that when the pronoun is part of a phrase within brackets we should be using el que etc rather than just que. I have fed the sentence into the respected SpanishChecker with both alternatives and neither was identified as wrong.
Can I use both por and con el ruido. Is there any difference between them?
Can I use mi pierna? In other lessor it was siad that it should ne la pierna. When can I use pronoun with body?
When I read into this, I found it a little confusing, we would actually say, he was meeting the lawyer tomorrow, to mean, He is meeting the lawyer tomorrow.
I think we say it as it was a decision taken before the present or the future. So for once a literal translation would work?
may i check if both situations mean the same thing?
I will speak to her when she gets home.
because i do not know when will she get home so i will use subjunctive.
How about if i DO know when she will get home and i am referring to the future time when she gets home, say maybe 9pm, is this still using subjunctive? although i do know the time, we are speaking of a non general situation that is happening in the future. Does this trigger the subjunctive too?
Thanks
Hello Kwiziq team .
I have a question concerning the use of the subjunctive mood.
1. No porque sea gratis significa que me lo vaya a comer todo
2. No porque sea gratis me lo voy a comer todo.
Are both phrases correct ? What is the nuance when you opt to use the subjunctive or the indicative mood.
Thank you in advance. Your answers are always helpful in solving our grammatical doubts
I am still confused when to use and when to omit the definite article. I end up guessing, which is sometimes right and often wrong. Example 1: "En lo que se refiere a incendios forestales." We're talking about forest fires in general and there is no definite article "los". Example 2: "Es importante que no nos olvidemos del cambio climatico." The English statement is that we must not forget about climate change in general. This time there is the definite article "el" or "del". Is there a rule or guideline that might clear this up for me? Thanks.
Es Paraguay una pais pobre, o una pais rica?
quien son personas famosos de Paraguay?
Como estan los cuidades en Paraguay?
como son los calles y casas en Paraguay?
As equivalent English examples, may I suggest:
To be opened with care.
To be applied...
rather than "Let it be opened..." etc?
I did not catch the first spoken sentence. I did not at all hear "tenemos mucha hambre y sed". Was something else said instead?
Find your Spanish level for FREE
Test your Spanish to the CEFR standard
Find your Spanish level