Spanish language Q&A Forum

Why is vamos a la biblioteca correct, and vamos a Cordoba is not?  {The correction says I should say vamos IR A Cordoba.

Un amigo espanol me dejó que "La mujer con la que está hablando" es correctecto pero "La mujer con quien  está hablando" no es correcto. Puedes explicar la diferencia?

Cómo explicarías "le" en la siguiente frase?

Es "the accidental se'?

Sus ojos se le llenaron de

lágrimas.

Maribel and I used to study English at the language school. The correct answer is noted as: Maribel y yo hacíamos inglés en la escuela de idiomas. But that does not make any reference to the studying.  Shouldn't it be: Maribel y yo estudiábamos inglés en la escuela de idiomas.

Thank you for the explanation in advance.

I don't recall seeing any lessons about imperatives, negative imperatives in particular. Did I sleep through them?

En la segunda oración... ¿Solo puede ser (como dado en la traducción), o puede ser también ? 

Because... the English given was "Finally we are going on a cruise" (literally, "Por fin vamos de crucero"); and of course "Por fin vamos a ir de crucero" would literally be "Finally we are going to go on a cruise".  I understand that the meaning underneath the use of the present tense English translation that was given indicates a future event; I'm just hoping for clarity about the correctness or acceptability of using the present tense in Spanish in this case.  Thank you!

I wrote "Que si hermosos palacios, que si parques espectaculares.." but I was corrected to "que si hermosa°s palacios que si parques espectaculares...".  I thought I heard hermosOs not hermosAs, and shouldn't the O be correct anyway? 

I have a screenshot of this if it is helpful.

Hi, I am trying to understand this lesson, and am confused by the two examples shown.

 Why on the second example you   put (accidentally) but not on the first example?

A Juan se le olvidó traer el hielo.

This mini lesson didn't address the error I had made, which was to select "si" when I should have selected "cuando."