Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,073 questions • 9,948 answers • 1,033,357 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,073 questions • 9,948 answers • 1,033,357 learners
Hi, in this exercise, Lola 'odia a los gatos' but I think that Danny "odia los perros", in Lola's translation.
Is there a difference in whether the personal 'a' is needed in each case? I weighed it up as - it is a definable person/pet? and I opted for 'not' using personal a because they hate dogs/cats in general. Hmm, but then again, they are sort of talking about their own pets?
Then there's the question of 'odiar' being clearly a strong feeling... but not exactly a strong affection.
Please help!
cheers,
Why not “estos pantalones, cuáles he tenido “?
I wonder what the purpose of the subtle but significant change of meaning in Tanta luz no es buena to mean "This much light is not good." instead of "So much light is not good?"
If one is hired as a translator, I don't think one would take it upon oneself to make a change of the speaker's meaning in such a way.
I wish there were a lesson explaining how the use of articles in Spanish differs from English. For example, "he has a good heart" is "tiene buen corazon" not "un buen corazon". Another example, "I will be in the first row" is "estare en primera fila" and not "en la primera fila".
Hi Inma,
Thanks a million this is really interesting and insightful to the use of Spanish. Saludos. John
This very lesson says that 'normalmente' signals the simple present, the so-called correct answer was the progressive.
At the moment, the availabilty of these homes is very limited is translated as:
Por el momento, la disponibilidad de estas viviendas es muy reducida
Why isn't estar used here because at the moment surely implies that the situation is a temporary state?
Gracias
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level