Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,109 questions • 10,005 answers • 1,051,610 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,109 questions • 10,005 answers • 1,051,610 learners
In English, "to hear" is a passive act to the person. It happens to them, whether they wanted it to or not. "To listen" is an active effort by the person. "If one listens well, he will hear it." The Spanish dictionary says that "oir" is to hear. However, "escuchar" can mean "to listen" or "to hear". Is that correct?
"La escuché cantando" could mean "I listened to her singing" or "I heard her singing". ??
Is that right?
Thanks
In the introduction to this lesson, you say the meaning is similar to using "haber plus infinitive". I think you mean haber plus past participle i.e. the perfect tense
Is it correct to answer questions with numbers in invariable form, that is, the same form that we use when we count?
Ex: ¿Cuántas personas hay en el aula? --> Hay doscientos uno.
Ex: ¿Cuánta cuestan estas? --> Quinientos veintiuno.
Thanks.
The fill in the blank read "Mi prima __________ Miss Universe." The interpretation read " My cousin was Miss Universe" I don't see why era should be considered incorrect. She was (past tense) implies that she no longer is, hence she used to be. I have seen many sentences like "Cuando era niña..." translated as when I WAS girl. As the sentence stands, either fue or era should be accepted. To be honest, I think era is a more accurate description.
¿Te interesa ir a los museos o te interesan las playas?
When translating to a passive sentence, why is it "se come paella" and not "se comen paella", when people is a plural noun?
Hello,
RE: Kwizbot puesto que era mi cumpleaños You puesto que fue mi cumpleaños
I was wondering why the imperfect was used here and not the preterit since the birthday was yesterday, which is a definite period in time and is now complete.
Thank you.
Nicoel
In the question, How would you say "There was an accident on the motorway" the nearest correct answer I can find is "Había un accidente...", and there isn't the option for preterite 'hubo'. However, because accidents are one time actions with clear beginnings and ends, it's more appropriate to use the preterite tense in this case. In fact, this particular sentence is a very common one to use when explaining the differences between the two conjugations and especially to illustrate why imperfect simply doesn't work here.
Why does the affirmative phrase use "tener celos" while the negative phrase uses "ser celosa"?Yo creo que Marta tiene celos.
Yo no creo que María sea celosa.I think Marta is jealous.
I don't think María is jealous.
Thanks!
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level