Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,084 questions • 9,965 answers • 1,040,680 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,084 questions • 9,965 answers • 1,040,680 learners
Why is it esta rather than estan when referring to las oficinas (plural of office)?
We would be wrong with you.
I would say "We would be wrong about you."
Hola Inma,
The sentence below appears to have the incorrect emphases; it appears as an example of desde que being used in the subjunctive, with something that will happen in the future. That said, I think you could retain the existing emphases as well because if I understand the lesson correctly, the subjunctive would also apply to hasta que.
Mañana, desde que aterrices hasta que llegues al hotel habrán pasado un par de horas.
Saludos. John
¿Cuántas personas acudieron a la manifestación? -Trescientas.How many people attended the demonstration? -Three hundred.
In the example ' Segun lo que me dijo Manuel, todo parecia ir bien' the verb is translated in the present tense. Isn't 'parecia' the imperfect?
Do all of these subordinating conjunctions always require a subjunctive verb to follow?
Hola Inma y equipo,
As part of the 'All related grammar and vocab' list for this exercise, would I be right in saying that Inma's excellent lesson, that I've included here, should also be listed?
Using tener + participio to express the completion of an action (perífrasis verbal).
Gracias
Clara
I really enjoy your reading practices. Good pacing and vocabulary complex enough for me to learn it well.
In the above example the English translation refers to “she”, but am I correct, that there is nothing in the spanish
sentence that refers to a “she”? In fact, wouldn’t “le” normally default to the masculine?
The test asked me for the correct verb to use with the sentence "Tu ***** la primero de la lista" - this seemed to be a temporary thing, so I chose "estas". The right answer was "eres" - i.e. a permanent state.
I am confused - can anyone explain why use ser rather than estar in this case?
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level