Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,041 questions • 9,882 answers • 1,024,245 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,041 questions • 9,882 answers • 1,024,245 learners
In answering this question, I used "excepto por". The lesson doesn't cover this option, but I have seen it in written Spanish.
Except for the white one, all the t-shirts are cool.
Te vamos a ayudar y vamos a hacer que pases este examen sin problema.
We're going to help you and get you pass this exam with no difficulty.
This above sentence in English makes no sense and would not be said. I tried to think of alternate ways of saying it, maintaining the integrity of the sentence. Here a couple examples:
We're going to help you, and make (sure) you pass this exam with no difficulty.
We're going to help you, and get you through this exam with no difficulty.
Perhaps someone else could provide a better solution?
This exercise provided another example of a passive which [at first] seemed to focus on the result rather than the process, such that I got it wrong > I wrote: "El viaje onírico X está X considerado [como] objeto de estudio". However, after thinking about it, I believe I can now see how it should be interpreted as a process and rendered: "El viaje onírico es considerado [como] objeto de estudio" - because the English original is equivalent to: "The dream trip is treated as a subject of study by scientists"... (Even so, a possible alternative is to think of it in these terms: "... is regarded as a subject of study", which is more like a result).
ves el mapa costa rica
Could we have used the infinitive for "... so I don't catch a cold" ? >> [rendering it as: "... para no coger un resfriado"].
My grammar book (by Butt and Benjamin) implies that 'por' might also be permissible here: i.e. "... por no coger un resfriado" - when it means "out of a wish or a desire to not catch a cold". Thus, I am wondering if [when a negative is involved] - "por no ... +infinitive" might actually be more common than "para no...+ infinitive" ?
ALLÍ talks about a further away distance from the speaker
I think allí fits the 'garden next door' (next door is a further away distance from the speaker).
Why is it considered a wrong answer in a test.
Does ¨reírse de¨ just means laughing at someone with ¨mockery¨ meaning, or it has another meaning?
Thank u so much
Hola,
In the sentence "Therefore, time should be invested...", I answered "Por lo tanto, se debería invertir el tiempo" while the given answer is "Por lo tanto, se debe invertir el tiempo". Since the English sentence shows 'should', shouldn't 'se deberia' be more appropriate than 'se bede' which would translate to 'must' rather than 'should'?
Gracias,
Benhur
If it is not part of a response or we use it as a response but not immediately after, we need "lo":"
I can see that if there is any preliminary statement in the response before a "No sé" is spoken then the "lo" should be added ("No lo sé"). But what does the phrase "If it is not part of a response" refer to?
Thanks,
John Nolan
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level