Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,119 questions • 10,022 answers • 1,055,040 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,119 questions • 10,022 answers • 1,055,040 learners
Hola Inma,
I used "planta" rather than "piso," and was marked incorrect. Is there a subtle difference?
Saludos
John
INTRANSITIVE VERB
4. (to marry; used with "con")a. to marryCasó con una chica de familia humilde.He married a girl from a humble family.Hi Inma, I've been enjoying your lessons.
Would it be correct to say:
"No pienso ir."
as:
"No pienso que voy a ir."
Thanks.
Me gusta esta historia porque soy un granjero!
Me han recomendado que ________ a un abogado. Someone has recommended that I hire a lawyer.contratecontratarcontrataríacontrataré
No entiendo por qué el Rey hizo eso. Él lo hizo porque quiso
Unless the Spanish have a definition of "conjunction" that differs from the one I've always understood, both "por qué" and
"porque" are both being used as conjunctions in those sentences. It is the sense of their use which differs.
Can these two uses be distinguished in spoken Spanish and if so, how?
Hello,
I am reading a fairly reputable bilingual version of Sherlock Holmes. On one sentence it says 'Iba vestido discretamente con un traje de mezclilla de lana....'
The translation (and my own reading of the context) suggests that this means 'He was discretely dressed....'
But if that's the case why have they used 'iba'? Is that incorrect? The man was not 'going to do' anything. He just 'was'. My searching online and using Google translate suggests that only estar (or possibly ser) in the past tense are valid here, not ir.
Thanks!
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level