Invalid Question.
Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,070 questions • 9,929 answers • 1,030,178 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,070 questions • 9,929 answers • 1,030,178 learners
Why is recoger used for both "tidy up" and "collect" in the questions?
Hola!
What is the difference between yo me llamo and me llamo?
As, the meaning are same on the examples of the sentences. Where do we use so?
Is there a special case in Spanish for using the Tener verb when it does not mean to possess something but to take something? Why would you say "Tened sus pertenences" instead of "Tomad sus pertenences"
Why did the first sentence not include the article for gimnasio, but later when used again, it was used with the article?
Please look at the verb form given for third person singular. The initial letters "rec" are not currently visible. Perhaps they are in the same color as the background color?
I have the basic idea of what an indirect question is but still have some trouble recognizing one. Could you give me some tips?
I read the lesson thoroughly, and Silvia’s answer below. I still struggled a bit with thinking about the mood of the sentence being determined by shared/non-shared knowledge or context in the case of a past event. For me, it has been a helpful trigger to think of aunque + indicative as directly translating to “even though”, but the situations that go to subjunctive something more like “while it may ”. I think this fits with Silvia’s comment that the main point of the phrase is sort of what comes next, the background/shared information is an acknowledgement of context, not the primary statement. Think about our sample phrase: “Sí, pero aunque fuera un éxito, tuvimos que ceder demasiado por nuestra parte. “. In my mind the approximate translation would be “Yes, while it may have been a success, we had to compromise too much on our side. And, “…might…” makes me think subjunctive. I hope this is accurate, and that it helps someone else.
I'm sorry, @Silvia, but I'm not following your response to John O. The intro paragraph refers to the phrasing "como si," but nowhere else in the lesson is the structure "como si" used anywhere. All of the examples are just "como" by itself.
I don't understand the relevance of the "como si" reference. Can you please clarify?
I understand the lesson, but would you be kind enough to explain if these phrases are interchangeable with words such as "quienquiera" and "dondequiera"?
For example, is "Sea quien sea el que me ha mandado flores, debe ser un romántico." the same as "Quienquiera sea el que me ha mandado flores, debe ser un romántico."?
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level