Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,019 questions • 9,834 answers • 1,014,939 learners
Thinking...
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,019 questions • 9,834 answers • 1,014,939 learners
There's a question about how we went to an Indian restaurant and ate everything because it was very rich. The thing they're eating is "food," but the answer wanted you to use "todo." They had it agree with the adjective of rich, but there's nothing that indicates a masculine noun.
I learned that when referring to parts of the body, not to use the pronoun mi because it is understood that it is my body. Also does the verb estar refer to something temporary. If so, why does a sentence say va a ser una experiencia relajante?
If the interrogative needs cuándo then: ¿Dice la pantalla cuándo aterriza el avión?
But for a non-question: La pantalla no dice cuando aterriza el avión.
yet the Kwiziq answer is: La pantalla no dice cuándo aterriza el avión.
HELP? por favor . . .
Please add “los anocheceres” to the lesson as an exception.
Only “Los amaneceres” is mentioned.
Correct me if I am wrong. “La alpaca es in animal de la familia de la llama y de los camellos” means “The alpaca is an animal from the family of camels”. May you clarify why it’s mentioned “de la llama”? Can we write just “la alpaca es un animal de la familia de los camellos”?
why don´t we use the preterite imperfect or preterite, as the event has happened already in the past and the preterite perfect gives some sense that it is still continuing?
I think 55% and 37% should be written in letters for the sake of pronouncing "porcentaje"
Another explanation I have seen tells that when the pronoun is part of a phrase within brackets we should be using el que etc rather than just que. I have fed the sentence into the respected SpanishChecker with both alternatives and neither was identified as wrong.
Diga a los señores Moreno y Ruiz que pueden pasar a mi despacho.
Is it incorrect to use "puedan" rather than "pueden" in this example sentence?
Thanks in advance,
Kaly
One of the examples is:
Su actitud se volvió violenta de repente.
Is it correct to assume that the change is a lasting one, as with someone who got hit on the head with a shovel and after that was a violent person?
Compared to:
Su actitud se puso violenta de repente.
In this case, cowboys in a saloon in a Western movie insult someone and he stands up quickly and draws his gun?
Just want to double check that these differences are correct. Thanks.
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level