Spanish language Q&A Forum

I'm having trouble answering this question because i don't understand it. kindly someone help! 

cambia el marcador temporal por uno que tenga el mismo significado en función del día en el que estás hoy. (let's say today is monday)

ejemplo)

Tomando como referencia que hoy es martes:

El lunes comí con mi familia.

→ Ayer comí con mi familia.

1. El mes pasado yo trabaj_é__ mucho.

→ 

2. Mi padre preparó la comida el sábado pasado.

→ 

3. Vosotros no salisteis de casa el domingo.

→  

4. Mis padres no durmieron la siesta anteayer.

→ 

5. Rina y yo fuimos de compras hace cuatro días.

→ 

why did it say it was wrong in the first part

Why is there a “th” sound in 19 or is this Castilian pronunciation?

I'm confused by the title of this article: "personal "a" verbs". Isn't the issue whether the direct object is a person or not, rather than the verb used? In addition to the verbs mentioned, isn't the same true of all the verbs on https://progress.lawlessspanish.com/learn/theme/830919 as well as necesitar, golpear, ... indeed any transitive verb? 

I found the sentence, ¿por qué habría de asustar un sombrero?— me respondieron. I tried looking it up and apparently haber de can be used conditionally to express confusion of a topic. i think this is important as well as haber que, i saw it in a book although i can't remember the sentence haber que is apparently also another form of obligation like tener que

the most attractive thing about him is his hair

lo menos atractivo de él es su pelo--my answer counted incorrect.  why?  the least attractive  thing about him is his hair.

every translator uses "lo" by itself and not "lo que".

Hi. As I have been learning the difference between imperfecto and indefinido, I have come to understand that imperfecto could be expressed as "used to " and indefinido as "-ed". So comer would be comia hongos (I used to eat mushrooms, imperfecto) or comi (I ate mushrooms, indefinido). 

This description of habia vs hubo seems to be the opposite: habia (imperfecto) is what I would think of as "There used to be... ", whereas hubo (indefinido) would be "There was". So I would think it'd be something like this: 

Habia muchos ninos en el parque - shouldn't this be like "There used to be a lot of kids at the park"? Definately a completed thing. 

Hubo muchos ninos en el parque - shouldn't this be like "There were a lot of kids at the park"? Who knows if it's a completed thing. 

But this lesson has it backwards, like "Habia" is - "There were..." and "Hubo" is "There used to be..." 

So I'm confused. I'm understanding the completed actions vs incomplete actions, but this lesson feels backwards. Can you please help me understand where I have it wrong? I've read many of your responses, and I'm not understanding where I'm off. 

Thanks.

Jeff