Spanish language Q&A Forum

It seems like it would be helpful if; when there is a statement and a response, that there would be two different speakers. This would give a conversational quality to the example. 

the lesson is simplified which is good but it would be more useful to elaborate the uses of the tense.

I thought it stated that ninguna or ninguno could not be used with a nouns??

In the beginning of the story, using present perfect was clear because she is saying that her best friend has come to visit.  Afterwards, when she is narrating what they did each day, we have specific time (the day mentioned) and what they did which to me seems to be how we use preterite for a specific time (day) in the past, so it is confusing to see present perfect for specific time events in the past.  Can you please explain why you continued to use pr. perfect and did not switch to another tense. To me (the "has come" in the beginning) would have been more appropriate with what they are going to do in the future since she mentions that "they have made tons on plans."

If the interrogative needs cuándo then: ¿Dice la pantalla  cuándo aterriza el avión?

But for a non-question: La pantalla no dice cuando aterriza el avión.

yet the Kwiziq answer is: La pantalla no dice cuándo aterriza el avión. 

HELP? por favor . . .

I was wondering how ir + gerund compares with andar + gerund?

“but another one with that voice”. 

How to say to have something done with a sentence using the verb in the 3rd person plural

this is the other lesson that uses 3rd person plural verb conjugation.

I find this lesson very similar to the other and I cannot see any differences at all.

for example,

me han robado . this could be for this lesson of being impersonal but this can only be under the other lesson that something negative happened or something was done on me.

Are they actually the same thing?