Spanish language Q&A Forum

I get it.  Le is not the correct answer for a reason, but not the reason given in the lesson examples.  Just because the preposition "con" is always followed by a subject pronoun is insufficient explanation.  It implies that "con" was already a given, but it was not.  I believe that "le" is an indirect object/pronoun and therefore not correct.  

In the "Examples and Resources" section I found this incorrect translation: 

 En la mañana ordeno mi dormitorio.

Your explanation says that whole hundreds AFTER 200 agree with the noun it precedes, but doesn´t 100 also?

I.e. hay cientas diez chicas?

If not what would be the correct answer?

From the examples given it's hard to tell why a native speaker would choose one of these adverbs in preference to another one in any given situation. Is there any guidance on this? Why would I choose 'igual' over 'lo mismo', for example, if they both mean the same thing?  

Hablo inglés perfectamente desde los trece años.  I speak perfect English since the age of 13. (since I was 13)

This sounds very Spanglish to me.  Surely it's   I have spoken perfect English since the age of 13

Why  not me gustaríá ser feliz en España ?

Hola Inma,

Me muy alegro que tú eres mi profesora. El nivel b2 no es muy fácil especialmente con respecto al modo subjuntivo y mi progreso es mucho más lenta que antes.

James

Hi, I noticed that this lesson link points to the -er verb version of this lesson.

And also A2  Using tanto como with verbs and nouns to say as much,many ... as (comparatives) , with adjectives is the Same lesson.

Hola Inma,

Please could you advise me?

When speaking casually as in the conversation here, is it generally more common to use 'estar' than 'sentir' regarding 'to feel'?

Gracias :)

Small point here. Lesson states " Faltar a un lugar means not to assist" . 

To assist in English translates to AYUDAR.

Should read FALTAR A UN LUGAR means not to be present. or not to attend, in this context.