Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,084 questions • 9,965 answers • 1,040,828 learners
Clever stuff happening!
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,084 questions • 9,965 answers • 1,040,828 learners
In the lesson, I answered the question, Maria, ___ es bastante seria normalmente cantó en público ayer, with ,"la que". It was marked incorrect, with "que" being shown as correct. I thought they were interchange.
I don't understand why "tanto" shouldn't be "tantas" since it is an adjective that modifies "políticas como sociales" - please help? ( I read the section on use of "tanto, tanta, tantos, tantas")
Can we also use the perfect future in both situations instead of either condicional simple or condicional perfecto?
I have checked 2 different dictionaries for the vosotros form of liar in the present subjunctive and both say that there is no accent.
I put 'en mitad de' and was marked wrong. According to your lesson on that topic they are sinónimos.
Please clarify
Gracias
Hola Inma,
The hint for the phrase "The clergy was the principal promotor ....." is to use the singular form of the verb for 'the clergy'." It should be singular form of the noun.
I enjoyed the history lesson in this exercise and definitely learned from seeing how the verbs "fundarse and instruirse" were used.
Saludos
John
The RAE seems to say that it is correct to have no accent on the vosotros vorms of liar and criar.
https://www.rae.es/dpd/tilde#12
I understand that No, Verdad are correct and taught in the lesson but is vale really wrong?
Do you mean that *ese* is used when both conditions are true or just one?
“ese, esa, esosand esas are translated as that and thoseand they all refer to:1. objects/people that are near the listener (not the speaker)
2. objects/people that are far from the speaker (medium distance)”
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level