Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,989 questions • 9,792 answers • 1,006,951 learners
I'll be right with you...
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,989 questions • 9,792 answers • 1,006,951 learners
Why do we need the indirect pronoun in this sentence at all as Flor is referred to by name?
Is it just for emphasis, would a natural speaker include it?
In question #1 where it says we are and the continuing form of the verb, I used estar + continuing form of verb and it was wrong. But in question #6, it is the same questions and I used estar + continuing form of the verb and the answer was right. What is the difference?
Why did you put an accent on Cuanto más?
The phrase "para aprender a ser" is the "a" an idiomatic expression? is two consecutive infinitives incorrect?
The first part of the sentence/question seems to be pronounced incorrectly in the recording.
Apropos of ' "Lo que" vs "la cosa que" ', I sometimes see "cosa que" used to mean "which", as in
Querían detenerme por robo, cosa que no hice.
Is this usage correct? If so, is there a lesson that discusses it?
More examples here:
https://context.reverso.net/translation/spanish-english/%2C+cosa+que
Thanks!
Could I say... Después de vivir en Madrid por diez años yo me he vuelto Español.
hi, i read that this is a latin america lesson for a, en, por.
What would be the equivalent for spanish europe? i am a bit confused here.
and all 3 of them seems to be able to be used for time of the day, so does it mean we can choose any of it to use ?
thanks
Hi,
I didn't get a reply to my question below, wondering if it fell through the cracks...
Thank you, Niocle
It says above "if the sentence has me, te, se, le, nos, os, les then no goes in front of these"
But what about direct object pronouns los, las, lo, la?
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level