Spanish language Q&A Forum

What type of usage would this be for le… if it was “le preocupa” or “le alegra” etc. Like “le alegra que ella haya dicho si a una cita” or “y hay otras cosas que le alegran” what is the le in these sentences or who is? Lastly “y le gustan muchas cosas de su perfil” thank you! 

When I read into this, I found it a little confusing, we would actually say, he was meeting the lawyer tomorrow, to mean, He is meeting the lawyer tomorrow. 

I think we say it as it was a decision taken before the present or the future. So for once a literal translation would work?

I continue to have exactly the same problem as the users below.  Your team really needs to fix this.

This article is extremely confusing. One of your examples is   Voy a salir aunque llueva and you use the subjunctive in the next example—llueve but your translation is the same!?  Aunque + subjunctive seems like it should be translated as even if, implying either they don’t know if it is raining or they are talking about a time in the future.  Aunque + indicative translates as even though and implies a known fact.  I am going out in spite of knowing that it is raining. The talk about shared or background information is something I have never heard before

the lesson is simplified which is good but it would be more useful to elaborate the uses of the tense.

No ha conseguido quitarla a la misión

Los soldados salen detrás de él corriendo, pero no consiguen ver nada a causa de la oscuridad y la lluvia 

No consigo olvidar nuestra conversación 

i found these sentences when reading a book. this is my first time seeing how conseguir is used with another verb infinitive. may i ask for a explanation? is this usage where conseguir + infinitive carries the meaning of manage to do something (verb) similar to poder + infinitive?

if the main clause is in future tense, do we use subjunctive too?

Estudiaré más dúro para que mis padres me traigan al extranjero

I will study harder so that my parents will bring me overseas

There's a quiz question that I got wrong because there is no indication whether the speaker sees the event as probable or not.  A note on this would help so we don't have to guess.

When I was a teacher we called this type of thinking "categorization", being able to tell things apart.  Nicely done.