hello
when to use (la) or (lo) to refer to a person? if she or he is the direct object? because of the quiz had cases for la and lo, i would properly mixing them with le.
Le and les are pronouns: they replace a noun (person, animal or thing) used as the indirect object in the sentence (object introduced by the preposition a).
Have a look at these examples:
¿Ella envía un regalo a Miguel? Sí, ella le envía un regalo.Is she sending a present to Miguel? Yes, she is sending him a present.
You also use le or les to replace the formal forms usted and ustedes:
| Masculine / Feminine | |
| Singular | le to it / him / her / you |
| Plural | les to them / you |
The indirect object pronoun is placed in front of the conjugated verb.
ATTENTION:
In Spanish, it's common to use both the indirect object pronoun and the indirect object noun it's replacing in the same sentence, for emphasis:
Here are some other examples where "le/les" refer to things:
See also Using lo, la, los, las = him, her, it, them (direct object pronouns)
Learn more about these related Spanish grammar topics
Examples and resources
¿Quién prepara la fiesta a Sofía? Nosotros le preparamos la fiesta.Who is preparing the party for Sofía? We are preparing the party for her.
¿Ella envía un regalo a Miguel? Sí, ella le envía un regalo.Is she sending a present to Miguel? Yes, she is sending him a present.
¿Luna escribe a sus amigas? Sí, les escribe.Does Luna write to her friends? Yes, she writes to them.
Q&A Forum 9 questions, 11 answers
InmaKwiziq team member
Hola Mohammed,
Le and lo/la have a different function so they shouldn't be mixed up. Le is an indirect object pronoun and lo/la are direct object pronouns. For example:
La llamé por teléfono.
I called her on the phone.
Lo llamé por teléfono.
I called him on the phone.
Le di un regalo.
I gave him a present.
Le di un regalo.
I game her a present.
Their function in the sentence is different.
Here is another lesson, in case you have not come across it, that explains the use of direct object pronouns lo,la,los,las.
I hope it helps.
Inma
FrancisKwiziq community member
Hi Inma,
I believe I understand what you’re saying in relation to direct vs indirect object pronouns but believe the examples should be worded differently to illustrate to the difference!
In the sentence that says I gave him a present; perhaps if it says “I gave a present to him” showing that he is the indirect object in this scenario... perhaps I could be wrong and it needs a preposition or it would be translated differently; I just find the present example hard to wrap my head around as they both sound like direct objects! Love your content though :)
Mohammed asked:View original
la lo
hello
when to use (la) or (lo) to refer to a person? if she or he is the direct object? because of the quiz had cases for la and lo, i would properly mixing them with le.
Don't have an account yet? Join today
InmaKwiziq team member
Hola Richard,
We replace le or les with "se" when there are two object pronouns in the sentence, both starting with "l", for example: le lo ..., le las... In these cases the indirect pronoun becomes "se". Here is a lesson on this precise content. Have a look.
When le/les become se
I hope this helps
Inma
Don't have an account yet? Join today
RickyKwiziq Q&A regular contributor
Why use 'a' instead of 'para' or 'por'?
In the examples of "¿Quién prepara la fiesta a Sofía?" and "Nosotros les preparamos la cena a nuestros invitados."
Why use 'a' instead of 'para' (for) or 'por' (on behalf of)?
Ricky
Asked 1 year ago
InmaKwiziq team member
Hola Ricky
Sometimes "a" has the same function as "para" (for), which is the case in this sentence:
"¿Quién prepara la fiesta a Sofía?" You could also say ""¿Quién prepara la fiesta para Sofía?"
In the second sentence you mention, "Nosotros les preparamos la cena a nuestros invitados.", the indirect object "nuestros invitados" is referred to twice: with "les" (to them) and with "a" (to our guests). Sometimes we admite the double indirect object in a sentence. Here are other similar sentences:
"Le he regalado una flor a Carmen" (I bought a flower for Carmen.)
"Les compré a los niños unos abrigos nuevos." (I bought the children some new coats.)
I hope this clarifies your doubt.
Inma
Ricky asked:View original
Why use 'a' instead of 'para' or 'por'?
In the examples of "¿Quién prepara la fiesta a Sofía?" and "Nosotros les preparamos la cena a nuestros invitados."
Why use 'a' instead of 'para' (for) or 'por' (on behalf of)?
Ricky
Don't have an account yet? Join today
RickyKwiziq Q&A regular contributor
Why use 'a' instead of 'para' or 'por"?
In the examples of "¿Quién prepara la fiesta a Sofía?" and "Nosotros les preparamos la cena a nuestros invitados."
Why use 'a' instead of 'para' (for) or 'por' (on behalf of)?
Ricky
Asked 1 year ago
SilviaKwiziq team member
Hola Ricky! First of all sorry for our late reply. We need to use the preposition "a" because we have previously used "les" as an indirect object pronoun and this preposition "a" introduces an indirect object refering to people ("our guests") in this case. However, you can omit this pronoun and use the preposition "para" instead too, for example, you could say "nosotros preparamos la cena PARA ellos". Both options are valid with a slightly change of meaning, like in English. The first sentence "nosotros les preparamos la cena A nuestros invitados" means "we prepare dinner TO our guests" and the second one "nosotros preparamos la cena PARA nuestros invitados" means "we prepare dinner FOR our guests". I hope this helps you to understand better! Silvia.
Ricky asked:View original
Why use 'a' instead of 'para' or 'por"?
In the examples of "¿Quién prepara la fiesta a Sofía?" and "Nosotros les preparamos la cena a nuestros invitados."
Why use 'a' instead of 'para' (for) or 'por' (on behalf of)?
Ricky
Don't have an account yet? Join today
RickyKwiziq Q&A regular contributor
In the example, ¿Ella envía un regalo a Miguel? Sí, ella le envía un regalo, why is there an accent over envia? Ricky
Asked 1 year ago
SilviaKwiziq team member
¡Hola Daniel! The reason why "envía" has an accent on the "i" is because phonetically it is an hiatus and the accent breaks the diphthong making a three syllable word "en-ví-a". We do not have currently any formal lessons about the Spanish punctuation rules but we would like to create some in the future. Silvia
Ricky asked:View original
In the example, ¿Ella envía un regalo a Miguel? Sí, ella le envía un regalo, why is there an accent over envia? Ricky
Don't have an account yet? Join today
DanielKwiziq community member
Inanimate Objects#
Why does it say "You never use le and les to replace inanimate objects."
When other sources say that spanish does not distinguish between inanimacy.
Asked 2 years ago
InmaKwiziq team member
Hello Daniel
We will remove this bit of information from the lesson because, although, more commonly used to refer to people or animals, "le/les" can also refer to inanimate objects, for example "Le añadí sal a la comida" (I added salt to the food), acting also as an indirect object.
Thanks for reporting this and sorry about the confussion.
Inma
Daniel asked:View original
Inanimate Objects#
Why does it say "You never use le and les to replace inanimate objects."
When other sources say that spanish does not distinguish between inanimacy.
Don't have an account yet? Join today
SilviaKwiziq team member
¡Hola Daniel! Could you please explain a bit more your question? Gracias, Silvia.
Don't have an account yet? Join today
SusanKwiziq community member
When do I use le , les and when do I use la, lo. Having big problems with this.
Asked 2 years ago
InmaKwiziq team member
Hola Susan
Lo, la, los and las are direct object pronouns, i.e pronouns that replace a person/people or a thing/things and they receive the action from the verb directly. Generally you spot them by asking the verb the question What? or Who?
See the following examples:
"Roberto compró pan" --> "Roberto lo compró" (What did Roberto buy? -bread [direct obj]
"Roberto llamó a Claudia" -->"Roberto la llamó" (Who did Roberto call?) -Claudia [direct obj]
lo and la are replacing pan and Claudia and they are both direct object pronouns.
Le and les are indirect object pronouns, i.e pronouns that replace a person/people (not things) and they receive the action from the verb indirectly. Generally you spot them by asking the verb "to whom"? or "for whom"?
See the following examples:
"Roberto compró flores para Claudia" --> Roberto le compró flores (For whom did Roberto buy flowers? -for Claudia, for her. [indirect obj]
"Roberto dio dinero a sus hijos" --> "Roberto les dio dinero" (To whom did Roberto give money? -to his children, to them. [indirect obj]
I hope this clarified your doubts.
Gracias y saludos
Inma
Susan asked:View original
When do I use le , les and when do I use la, lo. Having big problems with this.
Don't have an account yet? Join today
JamieKwiziq team member
When I answered this, I was going off the first green box that says le and les are not used for inanimate objects. But isn't this question asking for the word for "them"? Which are animate objects?
InmaKwiziq team member
Hola Jamie
This question is asking for the word for "them", which, like you said, it refers to animate objects (people), therefore it needs "les". In the lesson it says that you cannot use le-les for inanimate objects.
I hope this clarified your doubt.
Inma
Don't have an account yet? Join today
