Podemos cambiar que por la preposición para? No hay alimentos para comer?
Yes you could use "para" here; it's grammatically correct, and it's pretty much saying the same, but it won't sound as natural as using que + infinitives with the verbs haber, tener and quedar.
Sign in to submit your answer
Don't have an account yet? Join today
Test your Spanish to the CEFR standard