I get it. Le is not the correct answer for a reason, but not the reason given in the lesson examples. Just because the preposition "con" is always followed by a subject pronoun is insufficient explanation. It implies that "con" was already a given, but it was not. I believe that "le" is an indirect object/pronoun and therefore not correct.
Con el no me divierto. Why isn't the explanation logical?
- « Back to Q&A Forum
- « Previous questionNext question »
R W.Kwiziq community member
Con el no me divierto. Why isn't the explanation logical?
This question relates to:Spanish lesson "Using preposition con followed by a pronoun to say with me, you, him, her, us, you (plural), them"
Asked 4 years ago
InmaKwiziq team member
Hola R,
There is a note by the end of the lesson saying now that you must not use other type of pronouns with "con" and links to these pronouns (direct object and indirect object pronouns)
I hope this helps,
Saludos,
Inma
Don't have an account yet? Join today
Ask a question
Find your Spanish level for FREE
Test your Spanish to the CEFR standard
Find your Spanish level